Knowing The Two Main Choices For Oil Analysis Testing

| Wednesday, August 1, 2012
By Nikki D. Lennox


In a fully operating factory, any machinery without oil analysis testing in place is at risk of costing thousands in maintenance. Using a monitoring system, there is less risk of a serious problem occurring, with only a small amount of effort needed to manage it. Detecting system failures before they happen is important to any company that wants to stay in operation and reduce repair costs. It is recommended for those with high end or central machine systems to consider using some kind of testing maintenance.

Those interested in configuring oil analysis testing need to know about two main types; real-time sensor testing and lab sample testing. Using a sensor to undertake these checks means that the oil is repeatedly analyzed for telltale changes as it passes by the metal node. Alternatively, oil can be removed as a sample and tested for various aspects in a lab kit. Both of these are valid ways to look for problems, wear and tear and contamination, with different reasons to use either.

When 24/7 monitoring is not a necessity, the default choice is to use routine sampling of the oil. In environments such as the aerospace industries and energy plants, downtime is not an option so these continuous solutions are crucial. For others, however, oil analysis testing responsibilities shift from preventing the problem to foreseeing it. These lab units are not let down by ability, being able to track down inconsistencies to the very mechanism causing them.

Both of these methods have their own costs, and this will be one of the other main concerns about oil testing units. Most engineers will be testing for contamination and degradation as per the requirements of the service documentation of their machinery. This can leave long breaks between scheduled testing that could allow other problems to creep in unnoticed. If this is a problem, it may be more applicable to invest in a constant monitoring system such as a sensor detection unit.

There are applications that will require the use of both of these procedures, and this need will differ depending on many variables. The outlining features of each are that one is a flawless real-time warning system, and the other provides accurate analysis of samples. A crucial point to consider is how relied upon a system is, and if it could be left to run for a period of time without any diagnostics. The cost should also be considered, as this will be different depending on the option chosen. One thing both of the oil analysis testing kits have in common is that they are able to predict with superb accuracy where and how problems are going to occur if left untreated.




About the Author:



0 comments:

Post a Comment